|
|
By
the Translator This publication will vindicate the
enormity of the qadiyani mischief. I appeal to you to read it carefully and dispassionately
and then decide for yourself what you can do to curb the perfidy of qadiyaniat. I appeal to every Muslim, who desires
Allah’s Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) to
intercede for him on the Judgement Day, to cooperate with Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze
Khatme Nubuwwat in raising aloft the banner of Khatme Nubuwwat. I beseech every Muslim to display his
sense of honour against the qadiyanies. I invite every Muslim to rise and offer
whatever sacrifice he can for this cause. K. M. Salim
GENTLEMEN! I want to tell you briefly how qadiyanies
differ from other ‘Kafirs’. But before I do so, I shall answer a question which
is in the minds of some of our brothers. THE
QUESTION (in three parts): Firstly:
Why is it that an organization called Aalami Majlise Tahaffuze Khatme Nubuwwat
has been set up, specifically aiming to pursue qadiyanies to whichever part of
the world they go and expose them by Allah’s help and with the cooperation of
Muslim brethren when there are other non-Muslims also in the world, such as Jews,
Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, etc? Secondly:
Why is there no such organization against any other ‘Kafir’ community? Thirdly:
What was the reason for such stalwarts of Islam as Imam-ul’asr Muhammad Anwar
Shah Kashmiri, Sheikh-ul-Islam Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Binnori, Ameer-e-Shariat
Ataullah Shah Bukhari, and Hazrate Aqdas Maulana Mufti Mahmood, (Allah’s mercy
on all of them), to have attached so much importance to counter the ‘Kufr’ of
qadiyanies that it was considered necessary to establish an organization, on an
international level, namely Aalami Majlis-e-Tahaffuz-e-Khatme Nubuwwat? Before I answer, I sum up the question
which in short is: What distinguishes a qadiyani from other Non-Muslims? First
I lay before you an example: You know that wine is prohibited in
Shari’at. Drinking wine, manufacturing and selling it are all prohibited, i.e.,
‘Haram.’ Similarly, you know that a pig is filthy and impure. Selling its meat
which is called pork and its eating, giving or conveying are absolute prohibitions,
i.e., ‘Harame Mutlaq.’ Everyone is aware of these precepts. Now imagine a situation: A man sells
wine and calls it wine. Another man also sells wine but pastes a label of ‘Zam-Zam’
on the bottle, i.e., he is selling wine under the name of ‘Zam-Zam’. Both persons
are criminals but who is a greater criminal? You know the answer. Take another example: There is a butcher
who is selling pork. He sells it as such. Clearly he says this is pork. Whosoever
wants to buy may buy it. Certainly he is a criminal in Shari’at for selling pork.
Against this is a person who sells pork but calls it mutton. Now both these persons
have committed a crime in Islamic Law; but sky-high is the difference in the nature
of the offence between the two. One sells ‘Unlawful,’ i.e., ‘Haram’ calling it
‘Unlawful,’ Haram. The other sells ‘Unlawful’ Haram, calling it ‘Lawful’, i.e.
‘Halal.’ Anybody, unawares, could fall into his trap and eat ‘Unlawful-Haram’
pork thinking it to be ‘Lawful-Halal’ mutton. Thus the difference between a butcher
selling pork as mutton and a butcher selling pork as pork is precisely the difference
between a qadiyani and other Non-Muslim such as Jew, Christian and Hindu, etc.
‘Kufr’ is ‘Kufr’ in both cases because it is negation of Islam. But ‘Kafirs’ of
the world do not put label of Islam on their ‘Kufr’ and do not propagate their
‘Kufr’ as Islam. A qadiyani, on the other hand, puts a label of Islam on his ‘Kufr’
and deceives Muslims by saying this is Islam. So far I have spoken to you in general
terms. I shall explain the theology. ‘Kufr’ is of several kinds but three
are very obvious: First:
The ‘Kafir’ who is undoubtedly a ‘Kafir.’ Second:
That ‘Kafir’ who is ‘Kafir’ from inside but pretends as Muslim from outside. Third:
That ‘Kafir’ who tries to label his ‘Kufr’ as Islam. Category
No. 1: Jews, Christians, Hindus, etc., are
unmistakably and undoubtedly ‘Kafirs.’ The Polytheists (Mushrikeen) of pre-Islamic
Makkah were also included in this category. All of them are openly Kafirs. Category
No. 2: In the second, category are ‘Hypocrites’
(Munafiqeen) who recite
(arabi-112) “When
Hypocrites come to you they say, “We believe in you as Allah’s Prophet.” (arabi-112)
“And
Allah knows that you are certainly Allah’s Prophet.”
(arabi-112) “And
Allah testifies that Hypocrites are perfect liars.” Thus the ‘Kufr’ of ‘Hypocrites’ (Munafiqeen)
is greater than that of normal ‘Kafirs’ because by reciting Kalimah Tayyiba Hazrat Imam Shafai, (Allah’s mercy on
him), used to say about Ibrahim bin Ulayya: “I am his opponent, so much so, that
I shall oppose him even if he recites
It means that some persons are so compulsive
liars that they lie even in ‘Kalimah Tayyiba’ because their ‘Kalimah’ is a show
of falsehood. Category No. 3: The “Kufr” of the third category exceeds
the ‘Kufr’ of the second category because their offence is that they call their
‘Kufr’ as Islam. They present pure ‘Kufr’ in the nomenclature of Islam by twisting
the verses of the holy Quran, the sacred ‘Ahadith’ of the Prophet (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) the statements of his Companions and sayings
of revered saints in order to prove their ‘Kufr’ as Islam. Such men are called
zindiq (Dualist-infidels) in Shari’at terminology. To sum up, the three categories are
Unbelievers; (Kafir); Hypocrites: (Munafiq); and Dualist-Infidel: (Zindiq). ‘Kafir’ (Unbeliever) is a person who
does not believe in Allah and the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) neither outwardly nor inwardly. ‘Munafiq’ (Hypocrite)
is a person who hides ‘Kufr’ in his heart and his recitation of ‘Kalimah’ is false.
He is a pretender. ‘Zindiq’ (Dualist-Infidel) is a person who gilt-edges his ‘Kufr’
with the gold of Islam and tries to present it as real Islam. An apostate (Murtad) is a person who
abandons Islam. A precept should be understood here which is recorded in the books.
All the four schools of ‘Fiqah’ unanimously agree that in case of an apostate
(Murtad), Shari’at allows him three days to enable him to remove his doubts. All
possible efforts should be made to clarify his doubts. If he understands and re-enters
Islamic fold, well and good; otherwise he should be got rid of. This precept is
known as ‘killing of apostate’ (Qatl-e-Murtad). None of the Imams differs on this
issue. Laws of all civilised countries and governments award death punishment
to rebels. As apostate is a rebel of Islam, therefore apostasy (Irtidad) is punishable
with death. CONCESSION
OF SHARI’AT FOR APOSTATE Islamic Shari’at offers a concession
to its rebels while laws of the world do not do so. They must put their traitors
to death even if they beg for mercy after their arrest and award of sentence. Take the example of a rebel of any modern
government. He may repent, beg to be excused or vouch for good behaviour a hundred
times, assuring the government that in future he will never resort to revolt;
still he will not be heard. The capital sentence will be executed on him. His
repentance will be unacceptable. At no cost will he be excused. But Islamic Shari’at Law gives a concession
to its rebel. The Apostate (Murtad) is allowed three days to think over. He is
advised to withdraw and renounce his apostatic stance. If he assures for future
and is repentant, he is not punished. In spite of this humane concession afforded
by Shari’at, Non-Muslims criticise the Islamic punishment. It is a matter of surprise that there
are no objections to the hanging of a person when caught in conspiracy, say for
toppling the lawful Governments of the American President or the Russian President
or the Pakistani President. Conspirators are sentenced to death and no law of
any civlised court disagrees with this. Why do then people disapprove of punishing
a person who rebels against Allah’s Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and
say: Do not put him to death! Islam does concede three days’ grace to enable the
apostate to remove his doubts and come back into the Islamic fold. If he begs
for mercy or repents, Shari’at grants him his life back. But if he is adamant
and refuses to renounce his apostasy then Allah’s sacred soil must be cleaned
of his foul existence. APOSTASY
IS A DEADLY DISEASE It is so because it takes the form of
a carbuncle which stinks. If a malignant growth (Allah forbid) appears on some
part of human body, doctors advise its amputation. Who would call this a tyranny
over the patient? Rather a favour to him! By this removal the sound parts of the
body are saved from septic poisoning, else death would be certain. Therefore it
is wise to cut away the diseased part to protect he healthy part. In the same way apostasy is a carbuncle
of Islamic Millat. The malignant part, i.e., the ‘Murtad,’ despite preaching does
not retrace his steps. Therefore, cancerous malignancy must necessarily be removed
otherwise his poison will gradually travel inside the entire physiology of the
Islamic Millat. This indeed is the unanimous verdict of the four Imams, and theologians
and doctors of Shari’at law. Wisdom and sagacity demands it. The safety of Millat
lies in it. ORDER
OF SHARI’AT FOR A dualist-infidel is worse than an apostate,
because he is bent upon presenting his ‘Kufr’ as Islam. Imam Shafai and Imam Ahmad,
in their well-known sayings, were pleased to ordain that a dualist-infidel (Zindiq)
is governed by the same orders as an apostate (Murtad); that is, afford him a
chance first, give him time to repent and permit him to return; to the Islamic
fold. If within three days he does so, leave him unscathed, otherwise it is obligatory
to award him capital sentence. Imam Malik, (Allah’s blessing on him),
goes one step forward to say “I will not accept
the penitence of a Dualist-infidel.” By this he means to say that if a person
guises his ‘Kufr’ with Islam and does not repent, when caught in the act, then,
(leaving it to Allah whether or not He accepts his penitence), we shall certainly
promulgate Allah’s Shari’at on him, i.e., shall pronounce capital punishment for
him. This is a crime which is similar to adultery in which a person may be penitent
(Taaib) for future but his penitence will not save him from death. Therefore,
he will be punished under all circumstances. Similarly, hands are to be amputated
for stealing. A thief, on arrest, may offer penitence (‘Tauba’) but his offence
will not go unpunished. It is in this light that Imam Malik says:
“I
will not accept the penitence of a Dualist- Infidel.” Capital punishment will
certainly be given to him, although he may be penitent (‘Taaib’) a hundred times. Similar sayings are on record from Imam
Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hambal, (Allah’s blessing on them.) In books of
‘Fiqah’ such as ‘Durr-e-Mukhtar’ and ‘Shami’ and some others,
it is written that if a Dualist-Infidel offers penitence (‘Tauba’) of his own
free will, his penitence will be accepted without capital penalty, provided no
one came to know of his offence. Similarly, he will be excused from punishment
if he became penitent of his own free will, on Allah’s guidance. Therefore, if
a qadiyani renounces his ‘qadiyanies’ on his own and offers penitence (‘Tauba’)
then he will be excused. On the contrary, if he offers penitence (‘Tauba’) after
arrest then there will be no excuse, irrespective of his repentance even a hundred
times. Shari’at enjoins upon us to preach to
the apostate. If he as a result of preaching, undertakes penitence (‘Tauba’),
he will save himself from capital punishment but this does not apply to a dualist-infidel.
There is another saying from Imam Malik and Imam Abu Hanifa, and one from Imam
Ahmad, (Allah’s blessings on them all), that penitence (‘Tauba’) of a dualist-infidel
is not acceptable because he has committed the crime of dualist infidelity (Zindaqa),
i.e., he applied false coating of Islam over his ‘Kufr.’ I repeat, he has sold pork as mutton
and wine as ‘Zam-Zam.’ This is a crime which is not excusable and is certainly
punishable with capital sentence. QADIYANIES’
COVENANT OF ‘KUFR’ My purpose here is not to tell you why qadiyanies are ‘Kafirs.’ What I do wish to tell you is that in spite of their being diehard ‘Kafirs’ they present their ‘Kufr’ with the label of ‘Islam’. Take the case of our Kalimah Tayyiba
They do not believe in our ‘Kalimah’.
How can they claim to be Muslims? Please understand this clearly that a person
who doubts in their being a ‘Kafir’ is not a Muslim. They pretend to be Muslims
and say, “We are Musalman, we are only a sect of Islam called Jamat-e-Ahmediya”
But they are liars. They have established their colony near “I acknowledge
Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) as ‘Khatam un Nabieen’ with all
sincerity of my heart.” By this covenant they deceive poor simple
Muslims. WHY
QADIYANI ARE They are so for the simple reason that
they pour Islam into their mould of ‘Kufr’ and label urine as ‘Zam-Zam’ and dog’s
carrion as ‘Halal’. The whole world knows that Allah’s Prophet Muhammad, (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) was the last of the Prophets. This Islamic doctrine of finality
of prophethood is a definite certainty. On the occasion of his farewell Haj, the
Prophet declared:
(arabi-119) “O
people! I am the last prophet and you are the last Ummat.” Besides, there are more than two hundred
‘Ahadith’ in which the Prophet, (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) himself explained
about the finality of Prophethood (‘Khatm e Nubuwwat’). In different ways and
through different expressions he was pleased to say that there will be no prophet
after him and that nobody will be given prophethood after him. . . . (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) It does not mean that any previous prophet
is not alive. It simply means that if for the sake of argument all the previous
prophets supposedly come in the world in the times of our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and become his
servants, even then our Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) shall continue to
be the last prophet since nobody has been awarded prophethood after him. The list
of the blessed prophets in the manifest of the All-Knowing Allah carried his exhalted
name in the last. With his arrival, the list of the holy prophets became complete. MEANING
OF ‘LAST OF CHILDREN A child who is born last in a family
is called their youngest off-spring. He is the final child and none is born after
him. It does not mean that he is the last to survive among his brothers. Of course,
it sometimes happens that he is born last but dies earlier. Then the father says:
this child who died was my last one. In the same way, the last prophet (‘Khatam
un Nabieen’) means no prophet after him; no person shall wear the crown of prophethood
or sit on the throne of prophethood after Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam).
Those prophets who were sent down earlier are certainly within our Faith but our
Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the last one. None else will wear
the prophetic mantle of honour after him; nor will the Ummat put faith in any
such pretender. QADIYANI
HAVE ALTERED MEANING Qadiyani say that the epithet of ‘Khatam
un Nabieen’ does not mean that our Prophet is the last of the Prophets, and that
there shall be no prophet after him. In their opinion it means that our Prophet
Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) will certify future prophets with
his seal, i.e., on whomsoever he will stamp, that person shall become a prophet.
What a nonsense! In fourteen hundred years only one person, namely ghulam ahmed
of Qadiyan has been stamped as prophet and he too a cock-eyed man! The seal has
authenticated a one-eyed ‘Dajjal’ from Qadiyan! I repeat that the term ‘Khatam un Nabieen’
means that our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is the last prophet.
All new entries have been stopped. They have been sealed. No prophet will come
after him. It is like an envelope which has been closed by sealing it. ‘Khatam’
means sealing. Therefore, the term ‘Khatam un Nabieen’ means that the list of
the prophets is completed and the seal has been placed on it. Neither a fresh
entry is possible nor will there be any removal from that list. But the qadiyani have changed the meaning
of ‘Khatam un Nabieen’ to mean that our Prophet grants certificates of prophethood
to persons. In other words, Allah, who was previously sending down prophets, has
now transferred this department to Prophet Muhammad.( Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
for stamping people and making them prophets!! This is called infidelity (‘Zindaqa’).
In this way, they pronounce the name of Islam for meeting their nefarious designs
and twist the meaning of verses of the holy Quran to suit their agnostic beliefs.
That is why I say they sell pork and dog’s carrion as ‘Halal’ meat and produce
liquor under the holy label of ‘Zam-Zam.’ By Allah, I would not have cared one
bit for them if they had plainly said: “We are not Muslims and Islam is not our
religion.” This is also a religion of the world.
The Bahais believe in Bahaullah of Iran as their prophet. This group still exists.
We call them ‘Kafir’ and they have also declared that they have nothing to do
with Islam. Well, there ends the matter. But these qadiyani call their ‘Kufr’
as Islam and in this way deceive Muslims. It is for this reason that they are
dualist-infidels (Zindiq) and not simply Non-Muslims. Remember! A Muslim can be
at peace with a Non-Muslim but never with a dualist-infidel (‘Zindiq’) or apostate
(‘Murtad’). Who
has allowed you to: 1.
Call yourselves Muslims while you believe
in mirza ghulam ahmed of qadiyan as your prophet? 2.
Cancel the Kalimah of Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and adopt the Kalimah of mirza ghulam ahmed? 3.
Call the so-called ‘Wahi’ of mirza ghulam
ahmed as the basis of salvation in place of the true ‘Wahi’ of Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)? You impudently declare yourselves Muslims
and call us ‘Kafirs’. I quote from your mirza bashir ahmed qadiyani’s Kalimatul
Fasl, p. 110 : “Every person who believes in Moosa
but does not believe in Isa or believes in Isa and does not believe in Muhammad
or believes in Muhammad but does not believe in the promised Masih (mirza ghulam
ahmed), (such a person) is not only an Unbeliever (“Kafir”) but a thorough Unbeliever
(“Pakka Kafir”) and an outcast from the Islamic fold”. The qadiyani claim that Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) was destined to come down into the world two times,
first in Makkah and this prophethood lasted 1300 years, and secondly in Qadiyan,
at the start of fourteenth Hijra in the incarnation of mirza ghulam ahmed. Therefore
in their opinion, mirza ghulam ahmed is the reincarnation of Muhammad I quote again mirza bashir ahmed qadiyani
from his Al Fast, p. 158: “The promised Masih (mirza ghulam ahmed)
is Muhammad From the above it is evident that for
the qadiyani ‘La ilaha illallah Muhammad The
qadiyani fabricated: 1. a
different Prophet 2. a different Quran (named “Tazkirah”, which has
the same status in the eyes of qadiyani as is accorded to Torah, Zabur, Injeel
and Quran by the Muslims). 3. a
different Kalimah 4. a
different Shari’at 5. a
different Ummat How with all these very basic differences
the qadiyani have the cheek to tell the world that they are Muslims and that their
religion is Islam! They are Dualist-Infidels indeed. Allah protect us from their
calumny and cunning! NONSENSE I ask qadiyani: You call us ‘Kafirs’.
Why? What tenets of ‘Deen’ of Prophet Muhammad
(Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) have we refused to accept? Just because of mirza
ghulam ahmed’s birth all the Muslims of the world have become ‘Kafirs’! Before
his birth, our ‘Deen’ was alright as Islam and we were Muslims. After his creation
our ‘Deen’ has become ‘Kufr’ and we have become ‘Kafirs’ !! Allah protect us from
the qadiyani’ snare! Can there be any more nonsense to compare with? CRIMES
OF He has committed these heinous crimes: a. Claimed Prophethood b. Started a new religion c. Called his followers Muslims d. Called followers of Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) as ‘Kafirs’. Please tell me, if any Jew, Christian,
Hindu, Sikh, Parsee, Cobbler, Sweeper, etc., has ever committed this crime. Therefore
I say that the qadiyani are ‘Kafirs’ of the highest magnitude and of the worst
degree ever born. CONCESSIONAL
TREATMENT By Law of Shari’at, they should be awarded
capital sentence because they are Dualist-infidels ;’Zindiq’), calling Islam ‘Kufr’
and ‘Kufr’ Islam. If they are masquerading as Muslims on the face of the globe,
it is because they have not been sentenced. Despite this concession, they proclaim
that they are being tyrannized in Otherwise, remember! The Law of Shari’at
ordains to award them capital sentence. But the Government of Pakistan has given
them a concession. The qadiyani occupy high posts and offices in Government administration
and .public services. In spite of these concessions, they appeal to the United
Nations and to the Courts of Jews and Christians, clamouring that the Pakistan
Government has snatched their rights. What were their rights which have been snatched?
What wrong has been done to them? Only they have been told that Kalimah Tayyiba
is the Kalimah of Islam. a) be permitted to paste bottles of liquor with
labels of Zam-Zam’? b) be allowed to sell pig’s pork and dog’s carrion
as ‘Halal’ meat? c) be allowed to call our Islam as ‘Kufr’? d) be allowed to present the religion of cockeyed
mirza ghulam ahmed as Islam? The pronouncement of (arabi-127) from
the mouth of these hypocrites (i.e. the qadiyani) is 1. A disgrace of our Kalimah. 2. A disgrace of Allah’s Prophet. 3. A disgrace of Deen-e-Islam. They cannot be allowed to go ahead with
this disgrace and deceit. Allah has said about these hypocrites:
(arabi-127) “Allah
testifies that the hypocrites are liars”. These dualist-infidels (‘Zindiq’) like
an apostate (‘Murtad’) must be awarded capital sentence. In the following paragraphs
I record my reasons. COMMANDS
OF SHARI’AT FOR DESCENDANTS OF Shari’at allows three days’ grace period
for an apostate (Murtad) to get back into the Islamic fold. If he does not, he
is to be awarded capital punishment. I present a case for your study. Consider
for example some apostates who forsake Islam and who happen to be in so large
numbers that, being a sizable group, they appear to be out of control for an Islamic
Government to execute them. Let me be more precise. Take the example of an Islamic
country where the Muslim population of a town decides to become, let’s say, Christians,
and having done so, manage somehow to save themselves from the Shari’at punishment.
After a passage of time these Christians die their natural death leaving their
children as Christians. The precept for them is to force these people back into
the Islamic fold, by imprisoning them or by other appropriate means but not by
capital punishment. In other words, if the original parent was an apostate, his
son will also be an apostate. However, the grandson will not be an apostate; he
will be a simple ‘Kafir’ and shall not be liable to punishment for apostasy. COMMANDS
OF SHARI’AT FOR DESCENDANTS OF DUALIST The breed of qadiyani will never change.
They may multiply up to ninety-nine generations, still the hundredth one will
continue to be Dualist-infidel and Apostate. The reason is that their crime is
a never-ending one. So long they call their ‘Kufr’ as Islam their infidel dualism
shall see no end. This offence shall be ongoing in their progeny. For anybody unaware of the facts, let
it be clear to him that every qadiyani, whether he is so by conversion, or by
birth, or by heritage, is a dualist-infidel under the Shari’at Law because his
crime flows unending throughout his lineage. TEN
LEGITIMATE SONS Something more I want to tell you for
which I shall draw an example which, I am afraid, is crude but it suits here. A father had ten sons. All his life
he treated them as his sons. After his death a fellow gets up to claim that he
is the sole legitimate son and the ten are illegitimate. Two questions arise here: Firstly:
Will any sane person accept the claim of this fellow who is born of a non-descript
origin and who never laid his claim while the father was alive? Conversely, never
did the deceased father say to anybody that he had a son of that description.
Can any Court of Justice in the whole world adjudicate in favour of that fellow
and declare the ten legitimate sons as illegitimate ? No. Never! Secondly:
What will be the reaction of the ten legitimate sons against the non-descript
who calls them sons of adultery? Keeping the answers of the two questions
in mind, now listen: We belong to the Ummat of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) We fully believe in the
Deen which he brought forth. We are his spiritual children. If I say so, it is
no idea of mine but it is the holy Quran which speaks in these terms:
(arabi-129) ‘The
Prophet is more related to Momins than their self is to them’ (Quran: Ahzab 33:6) That is to say, no .member of the Ummat
of Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) has a stronger relation with
his self than what Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam)
has with each member of his Ummat. And the holy Quran further declares:
(arabi-130) ‘And
his wives are their mothers’.
(Ibid), It is therefore evident that all the
revered wives of the Holy (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) are our mothers and we call each of them
Ummul Momineen’ (Mother of Muslims)!; for example, Ummul Momineen Hazrat .Aiysha
Siddiqa; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Khadijat ul Kubra; Ummul Momineen Hazrat Maimoona;
Ummul Momineen Hazrat Umme Salma, ;and so on (rzu) When they are our mothers,
surely Hazrat Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) is our spiritual father. But children in a family are seldom
identical Some are more obedient, some are less helpful, some are more virtuous,
some are less dutiful, some are more wise and some are less clever, but they are
all members of one family despite their differing personality and varying individuality.
Still they are known as children of the same parents. Muslims have ever been the spiritual
children of Allah’s Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) for thirteen centuries, till, at the
start of the fourteenth century, mirza ghulam ahmed popped up from Qadiyan and
claimed solely for himself the spiritual sonship of Allah’s Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho
Alaihe Wassallam) and excluded all others. mirza did not stop at that, he dubbed
the Muslims as “Kafirs.” The whole Ummat of Islam has been abused by him as “illegitimate”
keeping legitimacy only for himself. On this basis mirza ghulam ahmed calls all
the Muslims as “haramzadey” (bastard). Allah protect us from his slander and abuse.
Excuse me for quoting the words of mirza ghulam ahmed but I had to. I ask the civilised courts of the world
to dismiss ghulam ahmed’s raving claim of spiritual sonship as a stupid claim
of that sinful vagrant of non-descript lineage who claims legitimacy to the exclusion
of ten real sons and who attempts to severe the connection of the whole Ummat
from their Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) in spite of the Ummat’s complete submission
to his ‘Deen’ from A to Z. Have we made any alteration in the doctrines of Islamic
faith or is it ghulam ahmed qadiyani who has sinfully done so? I happened to talk to a qadiyani once.
I told him: “We have been Muslims for thirteen centuries all along. Suddenly,
in the fourteenth century your mirza ghulam Ahmed appeared and made impossible
claims. Thus the discord ensued. Listen and be just. Here is an offer to you:
if our present beliefs are according to Islamic beliefs of the past thirteen centuries,
accept us and leave ghulam ahmed; and if your present beliefs are according to
the Islamic beliefs of the past thirteen centuries we shall accept you. Thus the
discord will come to a permanent close. Now, answer me because pros and cons are
equal for both of us.” That qadiyani was a Punjabi of Sialkot
city. He replied in the Punjabi dialect: (Translation) “The truth is that for
us everybody is a liar except mirza sahib.”(!) Now you must 1 have understood that
the qadiyani are a people who consider as liars the Companions (‘Sahabah (rzu) of the Prophet (Sallallaho Alaihe
Wassallam) the ‘Tabeyeen’ (contemporaries of Sahabah) ‘Aimma Mujt-ahideen’ (authorities
on religious matters and jurists), and ‘Mujaddideen’ (theological reformers) and
the entire Ummat spread over fourteen hundred years Gentlemen, I am sure you have now understood
that mirza ghulam ahmed qadiyani, the cheat, is deceiving the entire world by
calling himself a spiritual child of the holy Prophet.( Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) I turn to Muslims and ask them: Don’t
you have any grace left in you to answer these shameless qadiyani? They come to
you at social level, attend your meetings in public and private and repeat their
nonsense. On your part, you are a quiet listener to the descendants of a non-descript
masquerader. Alas, our simple Muslim brethren! Now
what are the obligations — your, mine and that of every Muslim? What does our
honour demand? It demands at least to have faith in the truth of Islamic Shari’at’s
decree on this issue, viz., capital punishment for an apostate and dualist-infidel.
But it is up to the Government to respond to the Shari’at’s call. However, this
much is within our reach that we cut off all social connections with them and
don’t let them enter our gatherings and face them boldly everywhere.
Corner the liar in his mother’s lair.
He has already been led away into his mother’s haunt; praise be to Allah. The
country of Many simple-natured Muslims of Africa,
That day is not far away when the world
will get to know of the truth: that the qadiyani are not Muslims, that they are
traitors of Islam, traitors of Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and traitors of humanity. Anti-qadiyani
movement is now surging the whole world, sweeping the qadiyani out. Final victory
shall be that of our Prophet Muhammad (Sallallaho Alaihe Wassallam) and his bondsmen. BONDSMEN
OF PROPHET For some time in |
